Università degli Studi di Perugia

Skip to content

Unit CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE

Course
Law
Study-unit Code
A000049
Location
PERUGIA
Curriculum
In all curricula
Teacher
Luciana Pesole
Teachers
  • Luciana Pesole - Didattica Ufficiale
Hours
  • 42 ore - Didattica Ufficiale - Luciana Pesole
CFU
6
Course Regulation
Coorte 2017
Offered
2018/19
Learning activities
Affini o integrative d.m.270/04
Area
Attività formative in ambiti disciplinari affini o integrativi a quelli di base e caratterizzanti, anche con riguardo alle culture di contesto e alla formazione interdisciplinare
Sector
IUS/08
Type of study-unit
Opzionale (Optional)
Type of learning activities
Attività formativa monodisciplinare
Language of instruction
Italian
Contents
The composition and organization of the constitutional Court; The judgement of constitutional legitimacy; Constitutional decisions; The clash of competence between the powers of the state and between the state and the regions; The judgement of admissibility of the abrogative referendum; Charges for presidential crimes.
Reference texts
E. MALFATTI, S. PANIZZA, R. ROMBOLI, Giustizia costituzionale, Quinta edizione, Torino, Giappichelli, 2016 (or A. RUGGERI, A. SPADARO, Lineamenti di Giustizia costituzionale, Torino, Giappichelli, 2014).
Educational objectives
The course is intended to acquire a thorough understanding of the role of the Constitutional Court in the institutional system.
Prerequisites
Knowledge of the basic legal rules, especially of constitutional and procedural law is required. This precondition is valid both for attending and not attending students.
Teaching methods
The lectures will deal with the program topics urging students’ active participation.
Learning verification modality
The exam includes an oral test consisting of a discussion-interview on the program topics. The test aims at assuring the knowledge level and understanding achieved by the students. The duration of the test varies depending on the performance of the test.
Extended program
The composition and organization of the constitutional Court; The judgement of constitutional legitimacy; Constitutional decisions; The clash of competence between the powers of the state and between the state and the regions; The judgement of admissibility of the abrogative referendum; Charges for presidential crimes.
Go top
Table of content
×