Il testo inserito in rosso rappresenta una guida alla redazione del documento e non è esaustivo.
4.	References
Inserire riferimenti bibliografici

5.	Participating organisations 
Note that:
•	Any inter-relationship between different participating institutions or individuals (e.g. shared premises or facilities, joint ownership, financial interest, overlapping staff or directors, family-ties, etc.) must be declared and justified in this part of the proposal;
•	The information (including table B4) must be based on current data, not projections;
•	The data provided relating to the capacity of the participating institutions will be subject to verification during the grant preparation phase;
•	The absence of sufficient information in this section may be considered by the REA as the ground to disregard the participation of an organisation based on insufficient operational capacity.
Table B4: Data for non-academic beneficiaries 
Name	Location of research premises
(city/country)	Type of R&I activities	No. of full - time employees involved in the project	No. of employees in R&I	Web site	Annual turnover (approx. in Euro)	

•	The information in the above table must be based on current data, not projections;
•	The capacity of institutions participating in successful proposals will be subject to verification during the grant preparation phase.

Per i Beneficiari non accademici:
La capacità operativa dei beneficiari non accademici può essere discutibile sulla base dei seguenti elementi:
1. Un basso numero di dipendenti e risorse umane insufficienti.
Chi supervisionerà il personale distaccato durante il loro distacco?
Nel caso di un beneficiario non accademico con pochi dipendenti a tempo pieno, chi seguirà il business aziendale quando un dipendente di questo beneficiario andrà in distacco?
2. Un basso fatturato annuo.
3. Una nuova società senza storia finanziaria.
Una PMI o una start-up con un fatturato annuo pari a 0 non passerà il controllo di capacità operativa.
4. La mancanza di risultati significativi nel campo della ricerca oggetto della proposta progettuale.
I beneficiari non accademici dovrebbero dimostrare di avere esperienza nel settore della ricerca oggetto della proposta, evidenziando pubblicazioni, brevetti, segreti commerciali o veri e propri prodotti/servizi relativi alla area di ricerca.
5. Spazio fisico (in termini di mq) non sufficiente per tutti i dipendenti e il personale distaccato.

All organisations (whether beneficiaries or partner organisation) must complete the appropriate table below. Complete one table of maximum one page per beneficiary and half a page per partner organisation. The experts will be instructed to disregard content above this limit (Min font size: 9).
Table B5: Organisations (beneficiaries and partners) data
Beneficiary (Organisations in EU MS/AC) Legal Name	
General Description	Descrizione generale del beneficiario unitamente ad una breve descrizione del Dipartimento che partecipa all’azione progettuale.	
Role and Profile of key people	Include names, qualifications of the person(s) supervising the project.	
Key Research Facilities, Infrastructure and Equipment	Demonstrate that the team has sufficient resources to offer a suitable environment to seconded staff and to significantly contribute to the research/innovation activities proposed.	
Independent research premises?	Please explain the status of the beneficiary's research facilities – i.e. are they owned by the beneficiary or rented by it? Are its research premises wholly independent from other beneficiaries and/or partner organisations in the consortium/Outside the consortium?	
Previous Involvement in Research and innovation projects	Describe relevant research/ innovation projects in which the organisation took part 	
Current involvement in Research and Innovation projects	Describe relevant research/ innovation projects in which the organisation is currently participating	
Publications and/or research/innovation products	Max 5
Le organizzazioni non accademiche è consigliabile che non lascino in bianco tale spazio. Potranno inserire pubblicazioni, brevetti, nuovi prodotti o processi.	

Partner (Organisations in TC) Legal Name	
General Description		
Role and Profile of key people 	As above	
Key Research Facilities, Infrastructure and Equipment	As above	
Do you have independent research premises?	As above	
Previous Involvement in Research and innovation projects	As above	
Current involvement in Research and Innovation projects	As above	
Relevant publications and/or research/innovation products	Max 3	

6.	Ethics Issues
Come aiuto per la preparazione di questa Sezione è possibile consultare la guida “H2020 How to complete your Ethics Self-Assessment” al link:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/
hi/ethics/h2020_hi_ethics-self-assess_en.pdf e la Sezione Ethics del Manuale Online Horizon 2020 al link:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-
guide/cross-cutting-issues/ethics_en.htm . 

All research activities in Horizon 2020 should respect fundamental ethics principles, including those reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. These principles include the need to ensure the freedom of research and the need to protect the physical and moral integrity of individuals and the welfare of animals.
Research ethics is of crucial importance for all scientific domains. Informed consent and confidentiality are as important for a sociological study as they are for clinical research.
All proposals considered for funding will be submitted to an Ethics Review. The Ethics Review is the core of the H2020 Ethics Appraisal scheme, which concerns all proposals and projects, and also includes the Ethics Checks and Ethics Audit that can be initiated during the project implementation.
When preparing a proposal, it is required to conduct an Ethics Self-assessment starting with the completion of an Ethics Issues Table (Part A). In this context, please be aware that it is the applicants’ responsibility to identify any potential ethics issues, to handle the ethics aspects of their proposal, and to detail how they plan to address them. Please refer to the Ethics Self-Assessment Guidelines under Horizon 2020.
If you have entered any ethics issues in the ethics issues table in Part A of the proposal, you must submit an ethics self-assessment in Part B section 6. For more details on how to correctly address the ethics issues of your proposal, please refer to the Ethics Self-Assessment Guidelines under Horizon 2020.
Your self-assessment must:
1) Describe how the proposal meets the national legal and ethics requirements of the country or countries where the tasks raising ethics issues are to be carried out. 
Should your proposal be selected for funding, you will be required to provide the following documents, if they are already in your possession:
•	The ethics committee opinion required under national law;
•	The document that is mandatory under national law notifying activities raising ethics issues or authorising such activities.
If these documents are not in English, you must also submit an English summary of them (containing, if available, the conclusions of the committee or authority concerned).
If these documents are specifically requested for the project, they must include an explicit reference to the project title and each beneficiary concerned must confirm that the respective document(s) covers the tasks described for the project.
2) Explain in detail how you intend to address the issues mentioned in the ethics issues table (Part A), in particular as regards:
•	Research objectives (e.g. study of vulnerable populations, dual use, etc.);
•	Research methodology (e.g. protection of any personal data collected, consent procedures, involvement of children, clinical trials, etc.);
•	The potential impact of the research (e.g. dual use issues, environmental damage, stigmatisation of particular social groups, political or financial retaliation, benefit-sharing, malevolent use, etc.).

Make sure to follow the guidance provided in the ethics self-assessment guidelines when addressing the different issues of your proposal and keep in mind that all proposals selected for funding will undergo an ethics evaluation that will check this section in detail.

7.	Letters of Commitment of Third Country partner organisations
Please use this section to insert scanned copies of signed letters of commitment from TC partner organisations (see Annex 4, point 2 of this Guide). The letter of commitment must explicitly refer to the proposal (call and acronym) as well as an engagement to implement the secondments planned in the proposal. 

Assicursi che il contenuto della Letter of Commitment delle Partner
 Organisations corrisponda precisamente alle task che sono state dichiarate nel programma progettuale. 

La letter of commitment deve fare esplicito riferimento alla Proposal (con indicazione della call e dell’acronimo di progetto) così come all’impegno ad attuare i secondments previsti nella proposta progettuale. 

END PAGE

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE)
Call: H2020-MSCA-RISE-2017

PART B

“PROPOSAL ACRONYM”