Unit PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
- Course
- Philosophy and ethics of relationships
- Study-unit Code
- A001177
- Curriculum
- Filosofia ed economia civile
- Teacher
- Nicoletta Ghigi
- Teachers
-
- Nicoletta Ghigi
- Hours
- 54 ore - Nicoletta Ghigi
- CFU
- 9
- Course Regulation
- Coorte 2020
- Offered
- 2020/21
- Learning activities
- Affine/integrativa
- Area
- Attività formative affini o integrative
- Academic discipline
- M-FIL/03
- Type of study-unit
- Obbligatorio (Required)
- Type of learning activities
- Attività formativa monodisciplinare
- Language of instruction
- Italian
- Contents
- The ethical proposal of anthropology phenomenology. From logonomy to bioethics
- Reference texts
- I REQUIRED BIBLIOGRAPHY:
1. I. Kant, La critica della ragion pratica;
2. E. Husserl, Lineamenti di etica formale; Lezioni sull'etica;
3. H. Jonas, Il principio responsabilità. Un'etica per la civiltà tecnologica,
II SECONDARY BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Stefano Bacin, Il senso dell'etica. Kant e la costruzione di una teoria morale, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2007.
V. Costa, Husserl, Carocci, Roma 2009;
G. Cusinato, "La totalità incompiuta. Antropologia filosofica e ontologia della persona", Franco Angeli, Milano 2008;
V. D'Anna, "Max Scheler", Roma 2006;
N Ghigi, L'etica di Edith Stein, Fattore umano (corso di stampa);
Claudio Bonaldi (a cura di), Hans Jonas. Il filosofo e la responsabilità, AlboVersorio, Milano, 2004.
Luigi Alici, Hans Jonas: Il male come irresponsabilità del potere, in Il male politico, a cura di Roberto Gatti, Città Nuova, Roma, 2000.
III. BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR INCOMING STUDENTS:
1. Lewis W. Beck, A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago University Press, 1960.
2. D. Zahavi, Husserl's Legacy, Oxford Press 2017;
3. M. Dupy, "La philosophie de Max Scheler. Son évolution et son unité", Paris 1959;
4. J. Parsons, Edith Stein: Toward an Ethic of Relationship and Responsibility, Duquesne 2005;
5. Marie-Geneviève Pinsart, Jonas et la libertè. Dimensions Theologiques, ontologiques, etiques et politiques, Vrin, Paris, 2002. - Educational objectives
- The course aims the following learning' results, whose acquisition will be evaluated in the examination:
- Knowledge of the fundamental lines of philosophical position of Kierkegaard, Scheler and Kurzweil.
- Acquisition of tools and skills of the phenomenological concept of anthropology,
- Ability to apply tools acquired in a critical and individual way. - Prerequisites
- In order to understand the content of teaching, it is necessary that the student has an appropriate knowledge of the history of philosophy and of phenomenology, and knows how to make an atractive process of historical and conceptual considerations. Indispensable is a critical attention during lessons and an ability to find solutions to problems.
- Teaching methods
- 1. Theoretical lessons face-to-face
2. Seminars and/or Laboratoty (Lectio magistralis) - Other information
- The course (if not in on line modality) will be by Palazzo Peiro, via dell'Aquilone 8.
- Learning verification modality
- The examination will be oral (30 minutes). The valuation is measured thirty and intends evaluate the methodological capacities and abilities taken during the Lesson.
Information for support to the disabilities: http://www.unipg.it/disabilita-e-dsa - Extended program
- The course aims to give shape to an anthropology of the human person in its entirety. Starting from a critique of the Kantian position in which the human being's life is governed by the duty and by the laws of reason for which, in ethics, there is a logonomy, with phenomenology is proposed the possibility for an emotional awareness in which, through the "primal" feeling, we can see the importance of feeling in human life and in ethics. Scheler's reflection will be useful in this regard in order to understand this feeling and prefer in an ethical context. His proposal for a material ethics of values ¿¿definitively goes beyond the limits of Kantian anthropology. Stein's community ethics of self-training and responsibility has the same focus. The concept of responsibility in Jonas, in its proposal for an ethical thought and an anthropology "for technological civilization", will conclude the journey by emphasizing the human choice and possibility of "deciding" a congruous "human" future for the person and for the interpersonal community.